mirror of
https://gitlab.com/orbital-debris-research/directed-study/final-report.git
synced 2025-06-16 07:06:49 +00:00
transision to report3
This commit is contained in:
parent
87de60c556
commit
5ab0b14f16
1
.vscode/ltex.hiddenFalsePositives.en-US.txt
vendored
1
.vscode/ltex.hiddenFalsePositives.en-US.txt
vendored
@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
|
||||
{"rule":"MORFOLOGIK_RULE_EN_US","sentence":"^\\QWikipedia gives a different definition^[Wikipedia: Characteristic Length] that defines characteristic length as the volume divided by the surface area.\\E$"}
|
||||
{"rule":"MORFOLOGIK_RULE_EN_US","sentence":"^\\QCalculation of Characteristic Length, @hillMeasurementSatelliteImpact slide 9\\E$"}
|
||||
{"rule":"MORFOLOGIK_RULE_EN_US","sentence":"^\\QCurrently, algorithms have been made that are capable of getting many key features from solid ^A mesh with a surface that is fully closed and has no holes in its geometry.\\E$"}
|
||||
{"rule":"MORFOLOGIK_RULE_EN_US","sentence":"^\\QThe summary is that using PCA determined that by far the most variance out of the current list of properties is captured by the principle moments of inertia.^Eigen Values of the inertia tensor.\\E$"}
|
||||
|
22
report.qmd
22
report.qmd
@ -266,7 +266,15 @@ CSV.write("scaled_dataset.csv", df)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Gathering Data
|
||||
## Machine Learning
|
||||
|
||||
The rest of the document is an in depth look at the progress made characterizing the current fake
|
||||
satellite dataset. The summary is that using PCA determined that by far the most variance out of the
|
||||
current list of properties is captured by the principle moments of inertia.^[ Eigen Values of the
|
||||
inertia tensor. ] I'm including this because it is already typed out and may be a good reference,
|
||||
but likely isn't worth digging into once a new dataset of scans can be made.
|
||||
|
||||
### Gathering Data
|
||||
|
||||
To get started on the project before any scans of the actual debris are made available, I opted to
|
||||
find 3D models online and process them as if they were data collected by my team. GrabCAD is an
|
||||
@ -276,7 +284,7 @@ assemblies found on GrabCAD, below is an example of one of the satellites that w
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## Data Preparation
|
||||
### Data Preparation
|
||||
|
||||
The models were processed in Blender, which quickly converted the assemblies to `stl` files, giving
|
||||
108 unique parts to be processed. Since the expected final size of the dataset is expected to be in
|
||||
@ -331,7 +339,7 @@ matter for characterization. The dataset is available for download here:
|
||||
|
||||
- [scaled_dataset.csv](https://gitlab.com/orbital-debris-research/directed-study/report-3/-/blob/main/scaled_dataset.csv)
|
||||
|
||||
## Characterization
|
||||
### Characterization
|
||||
|
||||
The first step toward characterization is to perform a principal component analysis to determine
|
||||
what properties of the data capture the most variation. `PCA` also requires that the data is scaled,
|
||||
@ -390,12 +398,12 @@ different shapes and the extreme values are slender rods or flat plates while th
|
||||
the center more closely resemble a sphere. As the dataset grows it should become more apparent what
|
||||
kind of clusters actually make up a satellite, and eventually space debris in general.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
### Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
The current dataset needs to be grown in both the amount of data and the variety of data. The most
|
||||
glaring issue with the current dataset is the lack of any debris since the parts are straight from
|
||||
satellite assemblies. Getting accurate properties from the current scans we have is an entire
|
||||
research project in itself, so hopefully, getting pieces that are easier to scan can help bring the
|
||||
glaring issue with the current dataset is the lack of any debris scans since the parts are straight
|
||||
from satellite assemblies. Getting accurate properties from the current scans we have has proved
|
||||
exceedingly difficult, so hopefully, getting pieces that are easier to scan can help bring the
|
||||
project back on track. The other and harder-to-fix issue is finding/deriving more data properties.
|
||||
Properties such as cross-sectional or aerodynamic drag would be very insightful but are likely to be
|
||||
difficult to implement in code and significantly more resource intensive than the current properties
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user